Why another “best crypto casino UK” list is useless, and what this one does instead

Search “crypto casino UK” and the first five results are editorial: gambling trade press, poker media, crypto news desks and a technology reference site. They have staff, they have publishing history, and they will out-rank a comparison page written in general language every single time. There is one thing none of them puts on the page — the clause number.

This site is built from documents. On 26 August 2026 the terms, verification policies, AML pages and licence certificates of one hundred crypto casino brands were read and recorded field by field. Thirty-eight of those brands were read live, forty-one from an archived copy of the same pages, and twenty-one could not be opened at all. Where a number exists, the clause it sits in is written next to it. Where a number does not exist, this site says the number does not exist rather than inventing a plausible one.

Nobody here holds an account with any of these operators. Nothing on this site is a report of playing.

What do these brands say about United Kingdom residents in their own terms?

This is the finding that reorders every UK list on the internet. Thirty-eight of the hundred brands publish a restricted-countries list that could be read in full. Twenty-nine of those thirty-eight name the United Kingdom in it. The standard wording is blunt — users from the listed countries and their territories “are not allowed to deposit and play real money games”. Wild.io spells the United Kingdom out alongside the United States, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Israel and France. Empire.io does the same, listing the United Kingdom between Trinidad and Tobago and the United States.

The brands that name the United Kingdom in their published restricted list include 7Bit Casino, BitStarz, Bitdreams, CryptoLeo, Metaspins, Mirax, Nine Casino, Oshi Casino, PlayAmo, Rainbet, Rakebit, Rocketpot, Shuffle, Slotum, Sportsbet.io, Wild Fortune, Wild.io, Winz.io, Bitkingz, Windice, DuckDice, Wolf.bet, Crashino, JacksClub, Empire.io, Instant Casino, Nitrobetting, Playbet.io and LeeBet.

Nine of the thirty-eight published lists do not name the United Kingdom: Bets.io, Bitcasino.io, Bitsler, Cloudbet, Coins.Game, Stake, Primedice, BetPlays and CoinCasino. That is a statement about a document, not about you. Absence from a list is not a permission, and several of those lists are extremely short — Stake’s published list names only the United States, Coins.Game’s names only the Netherlands, Bitcasino.io’s names only Japan. A one-country list means the operator published one country, not that the other 194 are welcome.

The remaining sixty-two brands publish no readable restricted list at all, and an empty field here means the page could not be read — never that the list is empty.

Which regulator stands behind a crypto casino, and what a licence number proves

The Gambling Commission licenses gambling supplied to Great Britain under the Gambling Act 2005, and a Commission licence carries obligations that a UK reader can actually use: published licence conditions, a public register of licensees, and an approved alternative dispute resolution route when a complaint is not resolved. None of the hundred brands in this library holds one. The Commission does not license the acceptance of cryptocurrency as a stake, and the operators here are licensed elsewhere.

Where a licensing authority could be identified, it was one of two: the Curaçao Gaming Authority, which appears for thirty-seven brands, and the Anjouan Gaming Board, which appears for twenty-five. Six more brands cite older or informally worded Curaçao and Antillephone formulations, and thirty-two publish no licence number at all.

Sixty-eight brands out of a hundred publish a number. The number of distinct numbers is fifty-three.

That gap is the whole point. Nine licence numbers cover twenty-four brands between them, because the register entry belongs to a company, not to a shopfront. The Anjouan registration ALSI-202508056-FI2, held by Novatrix SRL, is attached to five separate brands at once: Oshi Casino, PlayAmo, Slotum, Winz.io and Bitkingz. Scores55 Tech B.V. carries the Curaçao licence OGL/2024/1307/0748 for 7Bit Casino, KatsuBet and Mirax. Moon Technologies B.V. holds OGL/2023/111/0069 for both Bitcasino.io and Livecasino.io. Uno Digital Media B.V. holds OGL/2024/1267/0760 for CryptoLeo and Nine Casino. Ryker B.V. holds OGL/2024/1800/1049 for Jackbit and Freshbet. Santeda International B.V. holds OGL/2024/1798/1048 for Rolletto, Goldenbet and Velobet. Sorta Group Limitada holds the Anjouan registration ALSI-202508047-FI2 for Fairspin and Weiss.

Picking three brands off a comparison table can leave you with one counterparty and three logos.

Five brands carry a licence whose register status reads Revoked rather than Active: BC.Game on OGL/2023/118/0060, Bets.io on OGL/2024/1178/0479, and Betriot, Casinoly and Zet Casino, all three on the same number OGL/2023/103/0067 held by Rabidi N.V. The full register readings, including the nine brands that hold a Curaçao and an Anjouan licence simultaneously, are on the licence and registers page.

When are you asked for a passport, and what does the clause actually say?

The identity clause was located and read for forty-nine brands. Every one of the forty-nine reserves the right to ask for documents at the operator’s own discretion. Not one of them promises never to ask.

The wording repeats almost word for word across unrelated companies. Stake reserves the right “at any time” to ask for any KYC documentation it deems necessary to determine identity and location, at clause 4.8. Shuffle reserves the same at clause 4.1, Windice at clause 15.1, Rocketpot at clause 11.4, Bitsler at clause 4.3. Oshi Casino, clause 12, and PlayAmo, clause 12, both reserve the right to request verification documents before being able to process a withdrawal. Vave, clause 8.7, says documents may be requested before any payout at the operator’s discretion; Vave’s entry was re-read on 2 September 2026.

Five brands out of a hundred name a figure in the verification clause itself. Bitcasino.io, Sportsbet.io and Livecasino.io each set additional verification procedures for withdrawals exceeding €2,500, at clause 6.6. Rocketpot sets the same trigger at $2,500, or 0.05 BTC, at clause 11.4. Empire.io sets it at 2,000 USDT or the equivalent in cryptocurrency, at clause 5.4.

The other forty-four clauses give a right without a threshold, which means the trigger is whatever the operator decides on the day. What the clauses name as documents, what happens to a balance when a request is refused, and where a marketing page contradicts a terms page is set out on the identity checks page.

How much money can leave the account, and over what period?

Fourteen brands out of a hundred publish a withdrawal ceiling. Six of the fourteen state it per week, five per month, two per day and one per single transaction. Eight are denominated in euro, three in dollars, two in USDT, and one brand states a combined euro or dollar figure.

Brand	Published ceiling	Period	Clause
Oshi Casino	4,000 EUR	per day	12
Instant Casino	4,000 EUR	per day	8.1
BetPlays	5,000 EUR	per week	6.11
PlayAmo	7,500 EUR	per week	12
Mirax	10,000 EUR	per week	8
Slotum	15,000 EUR/USD	per week	13
Wild.io	100,000 USD	per 7-day period	9.6
Bitcasino.io	1,000,000 USDT	per week	6.10
Rocketpot	5,000 USD	per month	11.5
Wild Fortune	15,000 EUR	per month	11.8
Bitdreams	20,000 EUR	per month	Section 11
CryptoLeo	50,000 USDT	per month	7.9
CoinCasino	500,000 EUR	per month	9.6
Bets.io	10,000 USD	per transaction	10

The spread runs from 4,000 euro a day to a million USDT a week, and the two ends of it are not the same product. Rocketpot’s clause 11.5 is worth reading twice: it applies where a player wins $5,000 or more and caps payment at $5,000 per month, which converts a single large win into a payment schedule. PlayAmo publishes two ceilings in the same clause, 7,500 euro a week and 15,000 euro a month, so the weekly figure cannot be run four times.

The other eighty-six brands publish no ceiling, and that silence is not a promise of unlimited payouts. How the ceilings interact with the verification thresholds above, and how long a balance takes to clear under each one, is worked through on the withdrawal limits page.

If something goes wrong, who is actually there to hear it?

This is where the offshore licence matters most to a reader in the United Kingdom, and where the general-language listicles say the least. A Gambling Commission licence brings a defined complaints path. A Curaçao or Anjouan licence brings a register entry.

What the register entry does give you is the identity of the counterparty, which is more than most comparison tables manage. The Curaçao certificate portal at cert.cga.cw returns, for a given domain, the operating company, its Curaçao company number, the licence number, the date the licence was granted and its current status. For 7bitcasino.com that is Scores55 Tech B.V., company number 162990, licence OGL/2024/1307/0748, granted 16 July 2024, status Active. For bc.game it is Small House B.V., company number 164979, licence OGL/2023/118/0060, granted 4 March 2024, status Revoked. The Anjouan public register returns the licence number and the holder company but not a Curaçao-style company number.

Knowing the legal entity is the difference between a complaint and a comment on a forum.

Two further practical points come out of the documents rather than from opinion. First, twenty-nine of the thirty-eight published restricted lists name the United Kingdom, and a term you have already breached is the first thing an operator will reach for when a payout is disputed. Second, the same clause that lets an operator ask for a passport at any time usually also lets it hold the balance until the documents arrive; refusing the request and keeping the money is not one of the options the documents leave open.

What about tax, and what about the coins themselves?

Nothing in this library is a tax authority document, so this site does not print a tax rate. What the operator terms do contain is the payment side: which coins a brand accepts on which networks, and thirty of the hundred brands publish a coin list detailed enough to be recorded field by field. That is the layer where a stablecoin ceiling in USDT and a euro-denominated verification threshold stop lining up, because the operator applies its own conversion at its own moment.

One layer up, in the catalogue, the same pattern repeats. Thirty-three of the hundred brands publish a list of the studios their games come from, and those lists run from twelve names to a hundred and fifty. The studios named by thirty-three brands are counted there, together with the reason a long list is not the difference it looks like, and the reason a supplier list says nothing about whether the operator accepts you.

A ceiling in USDT and a threshold in euro are two different rulers laid against the same balance.

Which brands could not be checked, and why that is written on the page

Twenty-one of the hundred brands could not be read at all — the pages did not open live and no archived copy of the relevant terms was available. Those brands carry no verification clause, no ceiling and no restricted list here, and no review is written for them. Forty-one brands were read from an archived copy of the operator’s own pages rather than live, which is recorded next to every fact taken from them, because an archived clause can have been superseded since.

An empty field on this site means the document was not read. It never means the operator does not impose the requirement.

How to use these three pages together

Read them in the order money moves. Start with licence and registers to find out which company you would be dealing with and whether its entry still reads Active. Then read identity checks, because the document request comes before the payout and not after it. Then read withdrawal limits to see how long a balance takes to leave under the ceiling that brand publishes.

The dates matter and are printed on every page: the library was read on 26 August 2026, with Vave re-checked on 2 September 2026. Terms change without notice and without a changelog, so a clause number is an instruction to go and look, not a substitute for looking. Where a figure here disagrees with what an operator shows you today, the operator’s live document wins — and this site would like to know, which is what the about page is for.