Crypto Casino Licences and Registers: 68 Numbers, 53 Entities

What does a licence number on a crypto casino footer actually prove?

It proves that a company registered a domain against a licence, on a date, with a status that can be looked up. It does not prove who answers your email, it does not prove the money is segregated, and for a reader in the United Kingdom it does not create any route of redress. That is the whole of what a number carries, and it is still worth having, because most comparison tables reproduce the footer text without ever opening the register.

Sixty-eight of the hundred brands read on 26 August 2026 publish a licence number. Thirty-two publish none — no number, no authority, no register link. Seventy brands have a register URL recorded, because a handful of register entries were found for domains whose own footer stays silent.

The distinct numbers behind those sixty-eight brands come to fifty-three.

Why do nine numbers cover twenty-four brands?

Because a gaming licence is issued to a legal entity and then extended to the domains that entity operates. One company, several shopfronts, one register entry. The nine numbers that repeat are these.

• ALSI-202508056-FI2, Anjouan, held by Novatrix SRL — Oshi Casino, PlayAmo, Slotum, Winz.io and Bitkingz. Five brands on one registration.
• OGL/2024/1307/0748, Curaçao, Scores55 Tech B.V., company number 162990, granted 16 July 2024, status Active — 7Bit Casino, KatsuBet and Mirax.
• OGL/2024/1798/1048, Curaçao, Santeda International B.V., company number 151296 — Rolletto, Goldenbet and Velobet.
• OGL/2023/103/0067, Curaçao, Rabidi N.V., company number 151791, status Revoked — Betriot, Casinoly and Zet Casino.
• OGL/2023/111/0069, Curaçao, Moon Technologies B.V., company number 152185 — Bitcasino.io and Livecasino.io.
• OGL/2024/1267/0760, Curaçao, Uno Digital Media B.V., company number 157147 — CryptoLeo and Nine Casino.
• OGL/2024/1800/1049, Curaçao, Ryker B.V., company number 154186 — Jackbit and Freshbet.
• ALSI-202508047-FI2, Anjouan, Sorta Group Limitada — Fairspin and Weiss.
• 8048/JAZ, an older Curaçao-style master-licence formulation — LTC Casino and Primedice.

Spreading a bankroll across five of those logos does not spread the counterparty risk by five. It spreads it by one.

Which entries read Revoked, and what does that change?

Five brands in the library carry a licence whose current register status is Revoked rather than Active or valid. BC.Game on OGL/2023/118/0060, held by Small House B.V., company number 164979, granted 4 March 2024. Bets.io on OGL/2024/1178/0479, held by Bets Entertainment N.V., company number 155648. And Betriot, Casinoly and Zet Casino, all three sharing OGL/2023/103/0067 under Rabidi N.V.

The status is what the register said on the day it was read, 26 August 2026. Two of the five — BC.Game and Bets.io — also appear in the Anjouan public register with a separate registration recorded as valid, so a revoked entry in one register does not mean nothing is in force anywhere. Betriot, Casinoly and Zet Casino have no second entry recorded, which leaves the revoked Curaçao number as the only licence number those three publish.

A footer is not a register. The footer of a brand whose entry has been revoked usually still shows the number.

Can one brand hold two licences at once?

Nine of the hundred do. BC.Game, Bets.io, Metaspins, Roobet, Thrill, Thunderpick, TrustDice, Wild.io and Playbet.io each appear in both the Curaçao certificate portal and the Anjouan public register, under separate numbers and, in several cases, under separate companies. Thrill appears as Gravity Unleashed B.V. in Curaçao and Gravity Unleashed Limitada in Anjouan — the same name in two corporate forms. TrustDice appears as Satoshi Gaming Group N.V. in Curaçao and Satoshi Labs Ltd in Anjouan. Wild.io appears as Nonce Gaming B.V. on OGL/2024/210/0198 and as Stack Gaming Ltd on ALSI-202504044-FI2.

Dual registration is ordinary, not sinister — it is what an operator does while migrating between authorities or serving different markets from different entities. It does matter for reading a footer, because the number printed there may not be the one governing the account you opened.

Why do the two Curaçao sources disagree, and which one is used here?

Curaçao publishes licence information in more than one place, and the sources do not match. This library uses the certificate portal at cert.cga.cw, for one reason that is purely practical: it is the only Curaçao source indexed by domain, so a certificate can be pulled for the site a reader is actually looking at. The Curaçao Gaming Authority’s PDF register is organised by licensee and contradicts the portal in places. Where the two disagree, the portal reading is the one recorded here, and the disagreement itself is worth knowing about before anyone waves a screenshot of either one as proof.

A certificate from the portal returns a fixed set of fields: the domain, the operating company, the Curaçao company number, the licence number, the National Ordinance on Games of Chance it is granted under, the grant date and the current status. The Anjouan public register returns the licence number and the holder company, with no company-number equivalent.

Two registers, two shapes of answer, and neither of them is a complaints desk.

What does none of this being a Gambling Commission licence mean in practice?

Gambling supplied to Great Britain is licensed by the Gambling Commission under the Gambling Act 2005. A Commission licence carries published licence conditions, a public register of licensees, and an approved alternative dispute resolution provider that a customer can escalate to when a complaint with the operator itself has run out of road. None of the hundred brands in this library holds one, and the Commission does not license cryptocurrency stakes.

What replaces that route offshore is thinner and it is honest to say so. A Curaçao or Anjouan register entry identifies the licensee and its status; it is the raw material for a complaint rather than a body that will hear one. This site does not print complaint email addresses or procedural timelines for either authority, because those were not among the documents read on 26 August 2026, and inventing a plausible-looking process would be worse than leaving the gap visible.

The gap is the finding. A reader who understands it will read the rest of the table differently.

What else the register reading exposed about the brands on UK lists

Cross-referencing the register readings against the restricted-country lists produces the single most awkward fact on this site. Twenty-nine of the thirty-eight brands with a readable restricted list name the United Kingdom in it, using the standard formula that users from those countries and their territories are not allowed to deposit and play real money games. Several of those twenty-nine sit near the top of English-language “best crypto casino UK” rankings.

The nine readable lists that do not name the United Kingdom belong to Bets.io, Bitcasino.io, Bitsler, Cloudbet, Coins.Game, Stake, Primedice, BetPlays and CoinCasino. Four of those lists are one or two countries long — Bitcasino.io names Japan, Coins.Game names the Netherlands, Stake names the United States, Bitsler names American Samoa — and a short list is a short disclosure, not a wide welcome. One of the nine, Bets.io, is also one of the five whose Curaçao entry reads Revoked.

Sixty-two brands publish no readable restricted list at all, which in this library means nobody here could read one, and never that no list exists.

Where the year of establishment comes from, and why it is usually missing

Eleven brands out of a hundred state a founding year in a source that could be read: Cloudbet and Nitrobetting for 2013, FortuneJack for 2014, Bitsler and Oshi Casino for 2015, CoinPoker, Rocketpot, Bspin and Sportbet.one for 2018, Wild.io for 2022, Rakebit for 2024. Everything else in that column is empty, because an unsourced “established 2017” copied between affiliate sites is exactly the kind of number this library exists to avoid.

Eighty-nine empty cells are a more useful signal than eighty-nine confident guesses.

Reading this page next to the other two

A register entry tells you who holds the money. The next question is when they are entitled to stop moving it, which is the document request — set out with clause numbers on identity checks. After that comes the size of the tap: the fourteen published ceilings and the four periods they run over, on withdrawal limits. The overview of all one hundred brands, and what the top-ranking UK articles leave out, sits on the home page.

Every figure here was read on 26 August 2026, with Vave re-checked on 2 September 2026. Register status changes without announcement; treat a number on this page as a pointer to the register rather than a replacement for it.